Friday, 11 May 2012
-
Overzealous, petty AND stupid
What a fabulous combination for a manager. I'm so glad we have people like this.
There is a process, by which everyone is expected to follow when posting job rotations for their group. The process is quite simple.
- Hiring Manager
- Prepare a business case
- Get it approved by your boss
- Send it to my boss & cc me
- I prepare your job posting based on the position's job code, my boss ensures that union reps (if applicable) are all aware that it's coming
- You review the posting I send you and make revisions (if necessary)
- I post it
- On closing day, I attach all the applications and I send them to you. I will have checked that all applicants are permanent, full-time employees and that everyone CC'd their supervisor.
- Applicant
- Discuss with your boss to determine if you can be released
- Prepare your application (resume & cover letter)
- Email it to the Job Rotation mailbox & cc your boss
Simple, right?!
Well, Overzealous Petty & Stupid (OPS) didn't seem to think so. Someone in his group applied for a rotation. When she got an interview (i.e. has not been hired yet) he sent me a job posting that he created for her position, sent it to me and said get it ready to fire in the event that she is hired. He wanted it to go out the same day. A little overzealous, no?
Anyways...not going to happen.
First of all, OPS should've sent it to my boss. Not me. Second, I cannot issue a job posting unless directed to do so by my boss. Third, you cannot write up a brand new job description for a represented position. Otherwise the unions get VERY upset. You can only make small minor changes to the EXISITNG one. Fourth...where is your business case?
So, I kicked it over to my boss and let him kick it back. Cuz dealing with OPS is one of my least favourite activities.
But that wasn't enough.
He called to find out if there was a way to circumvent the process and just get it approved by the big boss. Uhm...dude, no. I'm not going to say that others haven't broken the rules like that, but it's not exactly something we encourage.
So, after a few back and forths, I eventually sent him a draft posting and said, "Let me know if this is approved and I will issue it." He emailed it back the next day. 5 minutes after he emailed it to me, he called my desk. I was in a meeting with my boss but I could hear my phone ringing at my desk (we were really close by). 5 minutes after that, OPS showed up at my office. As he walked by my boss' office, he saw me so he pedalled back and asked me if I had gotten his email and voicemail. So, I already told you the story about this. Honestly, wtf.
The next day, I issued his one-week job posting. The second day into this posting, he called to ask me who applied. I told him that to try to ensure some level of fairness, the hiring manager does not receive any postings until the day the posting closes. I then pointed out that there was already one applicant that foolishly cc'd him. Oh well. After some more nagging, I told him that was the only person that applied and that he should just relax because there were still 3 more days.
The day the posting was set to close, he called me and emailed me a few times to say that he wanted to be sure that he would get everything at 3pm because he wanted to review it over the weekend. Dude...I already have one micromanaging boss. I don't need more micromanagers who think they can tell me what to do. Fuck off.
Lucky for him, I'm very on the ball, so the email had already been scheduled to go with all the attachments at exactly 3:06 pm.
Meanwhile, there was a rotation posted to which *he* wanted to apply. So he sent me an email saying he was going to apply and that he had asked his boss to review his resume and cover letter. Seriously...I don't care.
On the last day, he applied to the position and did not cc his boss. So, I kicked his email back. Actually...I was going to just let it go because he had said he discussed it which his boss. *My boss* said to kick it back. So OPS leaves me this snide voicemail saying, "I don't know what your process is, or why it keeps changing or how it's enforced...blah blah blah." Again, fuck off. It flat out says in EVERY job posting that goes out, "cc your supervisor".
He did resend it. And in resending it, he cc'd his boss and wrote, "As requested by *insert cokeaddict's full name here*."
Dude. You trying to start a war here?! I didn't not REQUEST that you resend your application. I reiterated the rules and gave you the opportunity to do this correctly. I could've just NOT INCLUDED your application in the package to the hiring manager.
So...I emailed him and reiterated that these are the rules. I know I missed that his employee had not cc'd him when she applied to another job but that it does not generally happen. And since I didn't want to talk to him about this bullshit anymore (and I don't have to put up with his snide implications), I told him to direct all his concerns/questions to my boss (who is more than happy to stonewall him). That's not enough, obviously. So OPS emails my boss and cc's me to say he wasn't expecting a response (so you want me to ignore you?!) and that he wasn't referring to that employee as she had informed him of her intent to imply. It was for the clerk who applied to her position. This clerk reports to him. He's upset that she didn't cc him and I didn't kick her application back?? I didn't kick her application back because she's applying for a position that is in her current group. OPS is the hiring manager AND her supervisor. Seriously...maybe she didn't talk to you about it, but she's IN YOUR FUCKING GROUP!!! Applying to a job that is also IN YOUR FUCKING GROUP!!!
Honestly...I don't have the energy to put up with this shit. Administering this program wasn't even a part of my job. We had a clerk for this. But as a result of cutbacks, we got rid of the clerk and now *I* administer the program. But I have REAL work to do. Just follow the damned rules and everything will run smoothly. No one else has had any issues getting a job posting out!
Whatever, I'm hoping this idiotic issue dies once these two job postings close. Then, I hopefully won't have to talk to him again...if possible, ever.
Wednesday, 18 April 2012
-
Expediting
You want to know when you're doing it wrong? Here...let me enlighten you.
Emailing me your request.
GOODLeaving a follow-up voicemail.
OKComing to my office to follow-up in person.
BADDoing all of the above within a 20-min span.
FAILTry flirting with me.
DISASTEROUS FAIL
source: http://www.etsy.com/listing/88141621/rush-stamp-for-your-urgent-matters-c1950I promise you, if you show up at my desk, there is absolutely NO WAY I'm going to move your file today.
Sure, the fact that the guy who did this is a pompous ass who thinks he's all that did make me less inclined to work on his file. But that's not the point. I was not deliberately ignoring his email. I was busy putting out a fire for my SVP.
Your crisis is lower on the totem pole, dipshit.
Now GTFO of my office.
I have real work to do.
Monday, 02 April 2012
-
I thought we were done this
I like to think that I'm generally a tough cookie. And for the most part, I've convinced most people that I am. But even tough cookies like me occassionally have weak moments. We also have soft spots that we try to keep hidden -- especially from ourselves.
Yesterday, I had one of those less than stellar moments. Nothing embarrasing happened, but now I'm feeling emo. I had a fatty breakfast sandwich, some rice chips, and a cookie (but the cookie was the trainee's fault...his gf baked them so I *had* to take one
). And it's not even 11am yet!You know...it'd be a lot easier for me to be a tough cookie if he wasn't so damned sweet...and if he wasn't just so freaking my type.
Gawd...weak, girly emotions.
Where the hell is my purge button?

Thursday, 29 March 2012
-
One big happy family
I hate that phrase. I only ever use it when I am being sarcastic.
When you are actually part of one big happy family, you don't repeat that phrase. Just like no sane person ever walks around repeating, "I'm so smart. I'm so normal. I'm so cute." Seriously...who are you trying to convince? Others or yourself?
There are times when I see this phrase used to try and get everyone to march in step. Or to restrict the expression of diverse ideas. I don't like it because it's so...cult-ish. There. I said it.
I ask questions. I think for myself. I have my own opinions. That's the way I am. You can ask my *actual* family. And they will tell you, for better or for worse, I don't adopt anyone's view "just because" we are one big happy family. At best, to keep the peace, I may stay silent. But don't ask me to agree or openly support your view. That just ain't fucking happening.
*end rant*
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
-
Having one of these moments
I had one of these moments today.
There was an engineer who had an exceptional gift for fixing all things mechanical. After serving his company loyally for over 30 years, he happily retired. Several years later the company contacted him regarding a seemingly impossible problem they were having with one of their multi-million dollar machines. They had tried everything and everyone else to get the machine to work but to no avail.
In desperation, they called on the retired engineer who had solved so many of their problems in the past. The engineer reluctantly took the challenge. He spent a day studying the huge machine. Finally, at the end of the day, he marked a small "x" in chalk on a particular component of the machine and said, "This is where your problem is." The part was replaced and the machine worked perfectly again. The company received a bill for $50,000 from the engineer for his service. They demanded an itemized accounting of his charges.
The engineer responded briefly: One chalk mark $1; Knowing where to put it $49,999.
It was paid in full and the engineer retired again in peace.I emailed the VP my "invoice" (as a joke).
TOTAL $50,004.
4 keystrokes at $1 each.
$50,000 for knowing which keys to use.Looks like all I'm getting is an after work beer, though.
Sunday, 25 March 2012
-
Classical Music in Buffalo NY
In January, I found out that Joshua Bell would be performing with the Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra on March 24. I cannot express how excited I was to hear the news that he would be playing the Beethoven Violin Concerto so close to Toronto. My friend an I quickly bought tickets and planned our Buffalo day trip.

Now I have attended many classical music concerts in my time. I've gone to many cities around the world and enjoyed the glorious offerings that they have had to share by ways of classical music. But never have I attended a concert and left feeling so elated and sad at the same time.
The Music
Let me talk about the music.

The concert opened with Wagner's Overture to Rienzi. I was concerned about this since I'm not a huge Wagner fan (re: I strongly dislike most of his work). I can't express just how happily surprised I was to find it extremely enjoyable. There were parts of it that I didn't like, but for the most part, it was so reminiscent of a cheery, happy, Strauss that I found myself enjoying it immensely!
Maximiano Valdes, former conductor for the BPO, was the guest conductor at this performance. And whatever magic he was working at the podium was the good sort of magic. The orchestra shone. Schumann's Symphony No. 4 was filled with emotion. It's the kind of lyrical piece that makes you feel as though a single voice is singing. I usually prefer the more structured symphonies of the Classical period, but this Romantic period piece is making think I should perhaps not be so quick in the future to strike them off my list of concerts to attend.
So what happens when you take a great orchestra, an incredible conductor, an indescribably, amazing virtuoso violinist and ask them to perform their interpretation of the greatest violin concerto ever written? Well, if you wanted to know then you should have come to yesterday's concert.
I have always loved Beethoven's one and only violin concerto. I was always partial to the third movement. It's the sound of the Beethoven that I love. But, after yesterday, I think Joshua Bell has converted me to a lover of the first movement. Or, maybe it was just the cadenza he wrote for it. More on that later.This piece, I love it because it is so wholly the embodiment of Beethoven. It's strong music. It's rich and deep -- even more than the most luscious piece of chocolate cake you've ever had. Bell performed cadenzas that he composed himself. And they were GORGEOUS!! What I loved about them is that they didn't feel like they were written by someone else. Not only did they fit into the concerto, they somehow made the concerto bigger, brighter, and more beautiful. I know, it's hard to believe that it's possible to make Beethoven better, but that's what Joshua did. What I loved about it was that the in the cadenzas I could see everything that I love about Beethoven, but I could also hear the voice of Joshua and his Gibson ex-Huberman - the voice I hear in every piece he plays. There wasn't a point where you could separate Beethoven and Bell in this piece. But this is just my random rambling. All you really need to take away from this is that it was a gloriously beautiful concert and I just don't have enough positive words to express the pleasure I received from this performance.
If you want to read a review by an official music reviewer, this was posted earlier today: A superb Bell caps an unforgettable evening.
The Venue
Kleinhans has excellent acoustics. And it's got a lot of character. But that's where the positives stop. Sadly, the place is very dingy. It pains me to speak ill of a classical music concert hall, but it's true. When I walked into the lobby, I couldn't help but feel an overwhelming sadness - the sadness one feels when they enter a place that greatest has deserted. And this feeling only grew as the evening wore on. The greater my esteem in the orchestra's performance grew, the sadder I felt. How could an orchestra that sounds this good be left to play in a venue that has become so unloved? Kleinhans has great bones. As I said, the acoustics are beautiful. But that's it. The carpet in the main aisle of the hall was cream coloured but is so stained and dirty. The upholstered seats are a teal, burlap-esque material that also have stains and rips in them.

I am used to enjoying classical music in fancy clothes, and opulent venues. This orchestra is more than worthy of such a venue. Kleinhans sounds like such a venue. Unfortunately, due to lack of funds, Kleinhans has been left unloved for so long that it no longer *looks* like such a venue. A fresh coat of paint, new light fixtures, new upholstery and a new carpet would go a long way...although it really does deserve a revamp to update it.


This is grand music by a truly gifted orchestra. The players deserve a grand venue. Kleinhans needs to look as well as (if not better than) it photographs.

Source: http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article258286.ece/BINARY/w620/KLEINHAN'S+MUSIC+HALL.jpgI am a strong supporter of Toronto Symphony Orchestra, but I am also a strong supporter of the arts - specifically music - everywhere in the world. I think those administering the $1 B New York Works Infrastructure Fund would do well to carve out a small portion of money to update Kleinhans. Their players deserve it. The arts are an important part of society. And every great city has a great orchestra. If Governor Andrew Cuomo is serious about revitalizing Buffalo, then he should make sure the great orchestra that is the Buffalo Philharmonic has a great venue that matches the calibre of their performance.
Wednesday, 04 January 2012
-
Why dumping for a high draft pick is such bullshit
You're entitled to your opinion. So if you want to "argue" about this, don't bother. My response to you is, "You're free to believe whatever you want."
I'm sick and tired of everyone saying that the Habs should just shoot for last place to get a high draft pick. I don't care what anyone says about "thinking/planning" for the future. That is such bullshit. These are professional hockey players. I expect them to play their hearts out every single minute of every single game to try and win -- even if they're a mediocre team. They are not paid 6 to 7 figures to just show up and skate around so that we can get a first rounder.
As a professional, I would *never* do a halfass job. Having played competitive sports, I would NEVER do anything other than play to win. You know why? Because that is what athletes do. That is what professionals do. That is what people WHO HAVE A STRONG WORK ETHIC DO!!! How can you scream for them to just dump? I want them to TAKE PRIDE IN THEIR WORK! And to do that, they have to work as hard as they can, and then some.
If the coaches and management want to orchestrate some crap so that they can strategically end up in the bottom to try and get a first round draft pick, that's their perogative. I don't like it. I don't have to agree with it. But they hold the power so they can do whatever they want. If you think I'm not a "real fan" just because I don't "look at the bigger picture" then I don't want to be your kind of "real fan". I can be my kind of "non-real fan" and love every game where I see good hockey and cheer my heart out every time we win or score. I will not let some armchair coach, whose opinion has no bearing whatsoever on the cosmic balance of the Habs universe, ruin the moment for me by saying, "They should just trash the rest of the season to get a first round draft pick." If I'm going to take 3 hours of my precious time to watch a game, if I'm going to spend my hard earned money on tickets to a game, I don't care what their standings are. They had better fucking win.
I'm not telling anybody they can't voice their opinion. I'm not implying that anyone should change their opinion. I'm simply stating, if you're wondering why I went from talking to you all the time to not talking to you at all, here it is.
It's not because we have a different opinion.
It's because you try to ram your opinion down my throat at every possible opportunity.So, have whatever opinion you want.
Just respect the fact that I don't have to
(and I don't)
share that opinion.End of rant.
We now return to your regular scheduled blogging.
GO HABS GO!!!
Thursday, 22 December 2011
-
Because not calling you back after 5 months isn't a sign
Stage 5 Clinger. That's what he is. Doesn't matter that he's married (and has been for the past 3 years). Doesn't matter that we broke up more than a decade ago. Doesn't matter that I clearly have not shown any interest in maintaining a bond.
*obviously* I want to have dinner/drinks, tonight. You know...I have no plans. Just sitting around, waiting for a Stage 5 Clingy Ex (did I mention that he's married) to ask me out.

At the end of July, he texted me asking me to meet up with him for dinner or drinks. I told him I was busy. Between my best friend's baby shower, school, work, my parents moving out of my house and me going on holiday, I was basically all booked up until mid-October. I don't know why that wasn't a hint to him that I didn't want to go out. I said I had ZERO time over the next 12-13 weeks. He texted back, "Okay. We'll catch up when you get back from Europe."
Fastforward to today (~5 months). I get a text from him asking to go out tonight. Dude, what do you think? If you can't book me over a 12-13 week period, do you actually think you can book me on the same day? More importantly...it's not about whether or not I have plans (for the record, I do have dinner plans tonight). Isn't it obvious that I don't want to spend time with you? Besides, don't you have a wife? You know...that woman who hates my guts because all your friends called her "Rebound girl" when you started dating her so soon after we broke up? She's still insecure and has hang-ups, right? Even though we only dated for 2 years and you two have been together for more than 10 years? I mean, OBVIOUSLY I'm still a huge threat.
You should be spending your time reassuring her that you're not going to suddenly up and leave her for me. Remember?Sarcasm aside, I really wish he would just freaking leave me alone.
Monday, 19 December 2011
-
Pardon? Je ne comprends pas.
When losing, they [the fans] want a team you can relate to. What I hear now is if the team is losing, why not have team we can relate to?
~Francis Gagnon, La Presse
This has to be the stupidest thing I've read all day! Relatable losers?! How about I DON'T WANT US TO FREAKING LOSE ANYMORE!! If a Stanley Cup trumps everything (as he claims) then we shouldn't even be talking about having a team of relatable losers. I don't care who speaks what. Just get me a team that WINS! Sheesh!! Priorities, people!

Francis Gagnon is ridiculous. Just to blast point-for-point arguments:
- After that [winning the Stanley Cup], have as many Canadians and French Canadians as possible...Not only Francophones but guys from Ontario. Canadians.
Uhm, how about, even if we’re not Cup contenders, I’d like to see some wicked ass, excellent hockey? I don’t want to watch a team that sucks “just” because they’re all Canadian. I don’t watch Canada’s soccer team during World Cup for this *exact* reason. I’ll be supportive, but dammit, they suck. I don’t want to watch them play.
And how gracious of Gagnon to include, you know...guys from Ontario.
- Would the Leafs have a coach, like Pittsburgh did a couple of years ago, who only spoke Czech (Ivan Hlinka)? Of course, that’s not going to happen.
I’ve lived in Toronto since I was a very little girl. I’ll tell you right now, with the confidence of every cell in my body, no Leafs fan would ever give a crap about the language capabilities of the head coach if it meant the Leafs would play better and possibly win the Stanley Cup. And unlike Gagnon’s claim about relating to a losing team, I think it’s safe to say no one looks to Leafs to be relatable. When they’re losing, most Leafs fans just don’t give a crap and get on with life.
And you want to know *why* that’s not going to happen? It has nothing to do with Leafs, the fans or the Toronto media. It’s because you can’t work in China if you don’t speak Chinese. You can’t work in Brazil if you don’t speak Portuguese. And you can’t work administratively in the NHL if you don’t speak English. Players that don’t speak English have translators. And that’s the key!! The coach doesn’t *have* to speak English (though it being the only common language of the entire team of players makes this kind of significant), but he’ll need a translator. So Cunnyworth doesn’t speak French. His assistant coach does. Cunnyworth also said he would learn. And if that’s not freaking good enough, then the club can PAY a translator for him. - I can't imagine, even though there are lots of Francophones in Alberta, that English Albertans would accept a Calgary coach who would not say word in English. Vancouver, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Toronto would not accept that.
You know what? Toronto (I’m talking about the fans) are so used to everybody speaking English as a second language, and a lot of times not even speaking it well, I’m sure they would not even flinch at the thought of a non-English speaking coach. As long as he can limp along in broken English, enough to coach the team, the fans won’t care. The most you might get is an acknowledgement of, “Hey, did you know the new head coach doesn’t speak English? I wonder how that’s gonna work out.” But just as a side thought, you can’t work for the Government of Quebec if you don’t speak any French. So how do you expect to work in the English business of the NHL if you don’t speak *ANY* English at all? - I understand, Montreal, in having a coach who can speak French to fans, they would be putting aside some great candidates. But if Montreal doesn't give chance to Francophone to coach in NHL who will?
Opportunity. I agree. Montreal should give opportunity to Francophone coaches…BUT only if they’re NHL calibre coaches (and if they’re not proven NHL calibre, they at least have potential). I would not pick a mediocre coach over a superior coach based on language alone. The coach’s primary responsibility is to communicate WITH THE PLAYERS…NOT the fans. The team has an entire pack of PR & marketing people for that. I agree that most fans like being able to hear from the coach, but maybe that’s the responsibility of the media. Case in point. The Leafs have a growing contingent of Punjabi fans…who speak predominantly Punjabi and very limited English (if at all). The CBC (you know…that small media organization also known as the public broadcaster?) has a radio show that broadcasts the Leafs game…wait for it…wait for it…IN PUNJABI!!! Do you think that this community would demand a fluent Punjabi-speaking coach if their segment of the fanbase got bigger or became the majority? I don’t think so (in fact, I’m *sure* they wouldn’t).
I know there will be an argument about heritage and all that stuff. And truth be told, I (an Anglo-Quebecker, visible minority-child of immigrant parents who fled Quebec thanks to Bill 101) would *love* to see a French/English bilingual coach behind the Habs bench…or behind all the benches of Canadian teams. BUT, if they’re not the best candidate for the job, I will RESENT the fact that they got there just because they can speak French.
And another thing…not sure if you noticed, but Yuna Kim didn’t speak a word of English – her coach was Canadian Brian Orser. Tessa & Scott don’t speak a word of Russian…they have Russian coaches. England’s National Football team…coached by Fabio Capello – pretty sure he’s Italian. But maybe this will be deemed as “a different situation.”
This quote isn’t from Gagnon, but it’s significant.
The Montreal Canadiens once stood for excellence. Now they stand for something else. The team has gone on record that they must be representative. I heard someone in the press box say that there are not enough French Canadians on the power play? I understand it as an outsider, but I’m not sure it’s productive.
~ Michael Farber, Sports Illustrated
The fact that the language ability of the Power Play special team even factored into someone’s thought path makes me wonder why these people are even watching hockey. I want *my* hockey team to be the best damned team out there. They represent us because they wear our shirt. The franchise still does everything in both languages. In addition to our history and legacy, the fact that we’re the only team that does everything in both languages is one of the many things that makes us special. You can upgrade all the parts that are inside the car if you want, but if the body is a Toyota Corolla, then the car is still a Toyota Corolla. The body of our car is the best damned body out there…standing for excellence in sport, and the pride of Montreal. That doesn’t change just because we have different coaches and/or players. BUT, if we don’t upgrade the inside with the times, stay competitive, and build to win, then the pride and glory fade and all we’re left with is a bucket of bolts with Made in Quebec parts. I’m not saying we shouldn’t draft French Canadian players or hire French Canadian coaches. I’m saying that we pick them if they’re best. And if they’re not, then we pick someone else. If we’re doing really well and can afford to give opportunity to someone who might not be the best but have potential and can benefit from getting a break, then do it. When times are dire and we’re trying to stop our downwards spiral (hence the mid-season firing of a coach), THAT is when we must go with best-most-qualified – bilingual or not.
I love my team profusely and would never give them up. But I’m sick of the media creating a controversy over this. The thing that annoys me the most is, “Toronto wouldn’t stand for this either.” Because that’s just media bullshit. If you’ve ever lived even just two weeks in Leafs Nation during any of the hockey season, you would know, the fans wouldn’t care if the coach was Russian, Slovak, or even a penguin. If it means the team might win a Cup, everyone is fair game.
Source of quotes: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/bruce-dowbiggin/habs-coaching-appointment-stokes-quebec-nationalist-sentiments/article2275452/
- After that [winning the Stanley Cup], have as many Canadians and French Canadians as possible...Not only Francophones but guys from Ontario. Canadians.
Thursday, 22 September 2011
-
Randomness and dreaming
Be warned. This is basically a blog about nothing...I just I dunno...felt like writing something. Carry on.
Sometimes, dreams are not just an over active imagination. Sometimes, dreams are just your subconscious connecting a few dots for you because you're too stupid when you're awake to be able to connect them while there are bright, shiny objects in view. Now you know why I don't believe in psychic abilities. You aren't having some kind of psychic episode where you can tell the future. Your brain is just processing at a higher cognition level and making a better prediction of what's going to happen based on all the information you have - including the bits of information that your conscious mind overlooks (so that you don't go crazy from the details) but it registered by your subconscious mind.
Yah...lots of mumbo jumbo to say that you're not having visions of the future. You're just predicting better by including the information you normally disregard.
Despite all of that, sometimes people have some crazy ass dreams that have nothing to do with any of this.
And last night...I had one of those.
I'd share, but now it seems rather silly.
Because who the hell would want to hear/read about *that*.
The first night I'm away from home, usually means I'll have some crazy ass dream. I gotta say though, my friend's place is so nice and well decorated...I actually feel sorta like I'm in a nice hotel. Serious....when I'm done the renos at my place, I hope it's as nice as this place. Well...I'll have a lot of unavoidable dog fur at my place thanks to my fuzzball (Elfie) but aside from that...

- browse entries:
- older »
Recommended
-
weblog entry from leprovocateur
-
weblog entry from coolmonkey
-
weblog entry from ireallylikefood@ireallylikefood
-
weblog entry from coolmonkey
-
weblog entry from girl_smileyy
- browse recs:
- next »



True
